Be advised, the proposal for a proposal attached below is written in provocative language designed for members of Congress in both parties, namely the ones currently in power, and the writing is geared toward making the proposal pass under the current administration. Some of the terms used may temporarily raise your eyebrows, but the process of finalizing the draft for the actual proposal, such as the sample language from the draft below, will clarify your concerns. It goes to show that the powers that be are trying to take topics of government accountability hostage using party lines, and that cannot stand.
The DoJ is tasked with enforcing the law in the public and private sector. While the federal govt is busy going after violent criminals in the private sector, hopefully, those burdens are too great to also go after CRIMINAL violations of Amd. I, V, XIV, etc under 18 USC 242. Individuals are left to fend for themselves through litigation in order to enforce violations of these foundational constitutional rights which are supposed to be fundamental to the enabling authorities of all other laws! Therefore, we need a Department of Interior led by a top "Inspector General" with public interest powers to place unconstitutional govt laws and actions under the strict scrutiny of our foundational rights in court. As a longtime Criminology student, I have been thinking of these topics for a long time because I already planned my graduate dissertation around them. If you as a Liberal give a Conservative enough of a chance to listen to what they have to say about these topics, there is much overlapping agreement. Even though the "DOGE" sold the platform to 60 million Americans and did much of the opposite, carefully reminding those who proudly call themselves constitutionalists that there is no "constitutional enforcement" has always worked whenever I test the talking points in the field. And I test these hypotheses often.
Please sign up by clicking on the "Join Here" link at the top right of the page if you are interested in collaborating to develop the draft proposal. There is so much more to talk about related to logistics, the process of bringing a very serious goal to the regional protest energy this summer, and of course, the substance of legitimate govt accountability.
1. ONE OF THE BIGGEST ISSUES WITH THE "DOGE" IS IT'S SABOTAGE OF PRIVATE FINANCIAL DATA. THE FOLLOWING FROM THE ACTUAL PROPOSAL, NAMELY THE FINAL SENTENCE, WOULD TAKE THE EXECUTIVE ORDER LANGUAGE ENABLING SUCH NONSENSE AND REVERSE IT:
The United States Digital Service shall modernize government software systems to improve the quality and efficiency, promote inter-operability between agency networks and systems, ensure data integrity, and facilitate responsible data collection and synchronization. Access to any agency records, software systems, IT systems warranted, or other public or private data under this subsection shall adhere to inalienable rights of private citizens, other laws relevant to the identity and financial data of private citizens, and prior executive orders and regulations on the same subject matter.”
2. THE NEW EXECUTIVE ORDERS REPEATEDLY ATTEMPT TO ILLEGALLY REWRITE STATUTE. THE FOLLOWING FROM THE ACTUAL PROPOSAL WILL AMEND EXISTING LAW TO REVERSE THE "DOGE" REFORMS AND CLARIFY THE PURPOSES OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS:
-The Executive Offices of the President listed in 5 U.S.C. 900(c)(7) shall be removed from duties to the president as newly revised since January 20, 2025. The U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall be hereby terminated and consolidated as expressed in this title. Executive orders made since January 20, 2025 on the subject matters expressed in this title shall be hereby made null and void except as expressed in this title.
-The President and the Attorney General, subject to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 610, shall provide authoritative interpretations of law for the administration of the executive branch except as already settled by the judicial branch. No employee of the executive branch acting in their official capacity may advance an interpretation of the law as the position of the United States that contravenes the President or the Attorney General’s opinion on a matter of law without approval under 5 U.S.C. 610(d). Executive opinions on questions of law are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties in accordance with this section.”
3. THE NEW EXECUTIVE ORDERS PROVIDE A FREE PASS FOR WHITE HOUSE OFFICES TO CUT SPENDING, IN OPPOSITION TO EXISTING LAW I MIGHT ADD. THE FOLLOWING FROM THE ACTUAL PROPOSAL WILL CREATE LEGAL HOOPS FOR ANY SYSTEMATIC SPENDING CUTS AND ADD TO THE CONVENIENTLY-STOLEN IDEA OF MAKING ALL RECEIPTS FOR PUBLIC SPENDING PUBLIC:
“(a) Each agency shall work with the DOGE Team to build a centralized technological system within the agency to seamlessly record every payment issued by the agency, along with a brief, written justification for each payment submitted by the agency employee who approved the payment. The principal official of the agency in question may pause and rapidly review any payment for which the approving employee has not submitted a brief, written justification within the technological system. Receipts of all unclassified government expenditures and the payment justifications described in this section shall be posted publicly on a webpage set aside for the purpose on the Department of Interior website.
(b) Upon receiving a petition which alleges wasteful spending described in subsection (c) of this section, the principal official of the agency in question shall consult with the DOGE Team to review a covered contract or grant to determine whether to terminate or modify such funding. The principal official of the agency in question shall consult with the DOGE Team to conduct an annual comprehensive review of the entity’s contracting policies, procedures, and personnel.